Gautam Kumar @ Gautam Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10595 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2025 Thana- NAVINAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Gautam Kumar @ Gautam Kumar Singh Son of Ranvijay Singh Resident of Village- Maigra, P.S.- Nabinagar, District- Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nikhil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 10-04-2026 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 28.03.2025 at about 06:00 p.m. all the accused persons including the petitioner came and started abusing saying that why are you constructing the house, on objection, Ranvijay along with his wife assaulted the husband of the informant by rod and lathi causing injury, when the family members intervened, petitioner, Ranvijay, Nandkishor and Santosh along with 10 unknown accused assaulted the informant's son with sharp edged weapons, thereafter petitioner assaulted the informant's younger son and Santosh gave orders to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10595 of 2026(2) dt.10-04-2026 2/2 shoot on which petitioner and Ranvijay Singh said that the injured is already dead and thus all the accused fled.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that no doubt petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the younger son of the informant, but then petitioner is not a criminal. It is also submitted that if privilege of regular bail is granted to the petitioner, the petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the trial to prove his innocence. It is also submitted that petitioner is in custody since 24-11-2025.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 98 of 2025.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T