Raju Yadav @ Rajnandan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21774 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2020 Thana- THARTHARI District- Nalanda ====================================================== RAJU YADAV @ RAJNANDAN PRASAD Son of Raj Ballam Prasad Resident of Village - Rupan Bigha, P.S.- Tharthari, District - Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 20-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honour his undertaking to remove the defects as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Tharthari P.S. Case no. 98 of 2020 instituted for the offence under Sections 379, 354, 504, 147, 149, 447, 341 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, on receiving information about scuffle due to land dispute between two parties, police party proceeded there. On seeing the police party, all of them started fleeing away. In process of chasing, one desi pistol and one cartridge of .315 bore have fallen down from co-accused

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21774 of 2021(2) dt.20-12-2021 2/2 Jitendra Kumar and petitioner, respectively. Both persons were identified by Mahal Chowkidar Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession. There is one criminal antecedent against the petitioner, in which he is on bail.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Tharthari P.S. Case no. 98 of 2020, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-1st Hilsa, Nalanda subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U T