Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21530/2021allowed

Md. Toofani Mian @ Md. Tufani Mian v. The State Of Bihar

2021-09-14Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21530 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2020 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- West Champaran ====================================================== MD. TOOFANI MIAN @ MD. TUFANI MIAN, S/o Late Satar Mian, Village- Nankar Motihari, P.S.- Shikarpur, Dist- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhannjay Kumar No 2, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 14-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual Court proceedings. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the office within four weeks of normal functioning of the court, failing which the office is directed to place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 2, 9, 27, 29, 31, 39, 43, 49(a) and 51 of the Wildlife Animal Protection Act. Allegation against the petitioner is that the Forest Range Officer along with his subordinates were recovered 95 specified bids and 01 kg. Meat of birds from the possession of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21530 of 2021(2) dt.14-09-2021 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no recovery from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 12.12.2020. The petitioner has got one criminal antecedent which is mentioned in para 3 of the bail petition.

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail application.

Considering the custody of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Forest Case No.60 F/2020 to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending/ successor Court.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amitkumar/- U T