Dhiro @ Dhiro Singh @ Dhiraj Singh @ Dhiru Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4255 of 2017 (4) dt.22-03-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4255 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -90 Year- 2013 Thana -SHEKHPURA District- SEKHPURA ====================================================== DHIRO @ DHIRO SINGH @ DHIRAJ SINGH @ DHIRU SINGH, SON OF RAM NANDAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DEWSA, P.S. & DISTRICT- SHEIKHPURA.

.... .... PETITIONER/S

VERSUS

THE STATE OF BIHAR .... .... OPPOSITE PARTY/S ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arbind Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Sessions Trial No. 606 of 2013 arising out of Sheikhpura (Kusumbha O.P.) P.S. Case No. 90 of 2013, registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge, Sheikhpura.

The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected vide order dated 29.01.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 30329 of 2014 by a Bench of this Court.

A report regarding the present stage of trial has

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4255 of 2017 (4) dt.22-03-2017 been received through letter no. 24 dated 09.03.2017, from the court of Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Sheikhpura, which disclosed that now the case is fixed for argument and the trial is expected to be concluded within two months.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, I find no ground to reconsider the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. However, the trial court is directed to conclude the trial of the petitioner within three months by taking all effective steps. If the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within aforesaid period of three months, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T