Parmeshwari Paswan @Parmeshri Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13103 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -193 Year- 2016 Thana -BIHARIGANJ District- MADHEPURA ====================================================== Parmeshwari Paswan @ Parmeshri Paswan, S/o Late Raghunandan Paswan, resident of village- Rajganj, P.S. Bihariganj, District Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 29-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 23.11.2016 in connection with Bihariganj P.S. Case No. 193 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Sections 466, 467, 468, 471, 472 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the petitioner has not committed any forgery in the Parwana, a copy of which was duly attested by the Circle Officer. Charge sheet has been submitted in the case and there is no chance of tampering with the evidence. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Mr. Abhimanyu Kumar, learned Judicial Magistrate, Second Class, Uda Kishunganj, District Madhepura in connection with Bihariganj P.S. Case No. 193 of 2016 with the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13103 of 2017 (2) dt.29-03-2017 2/2 petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Ibrar U T