Patna High CourtMJC/1261/2014disposed

Savitri Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-03-18Mr. Justice V.N. Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1261 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 22916 of 2012 =========================================================== Savitri Devi, W/o- Nawal Kishore Singh, resident of Village- Law, P.S. Takari, District- Gaya .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Sri Balmurgandi, the District Magistrate, Gaya.

2. Sri R.K. Singh, the Director, Economic Offence/Branch Bihar, Patna.

3. Nishank Kumar Tiwari, the Superintendent of Police, Gaya.

4. Kishore Kumar, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tekari, Gaya.

5. S.K. Prasad, the Dy. Superintendent of Police, Administration, Gaya.

6. Bidhanchandra Rai, the Circle Officer, Tekari, Gaya.

7. Pradeep Kumar, the S.H.O., Tekari Police Station, Gaya.

8. Kamta Singh, son of Ganga Vishun Singh.

9. Satyendra Sing, son of Ganga Vishun Singh.

10. Sanjay Kumar, son of Kamta Singh

11. Dharmendra Kumar, son of Kamta Singh

12. Deepak Kumar, son of Kamta Singh.

13. Anil Kumar, son of Sateyendra Singh.

14. Janardhan Singh @ Angad Singh, son of Late Sitaram Singh

15. Rajesh Kumar, son of Late Sitaram Singh.

16. Ajit Kumar, son of Nanardhan Singh.

17. Tulsi Yadav, son of Jaddu Yadav.

18. Bishundeo Yadav, son of Harilal Yadav.

19. Nizam Ali, son of Md. Ali.

All are resident of Village- Lav, P.S. Tekari, District- Gaya .... .... Opposite Parties.

=========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr.

For the Opposite Parties : Mr.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 18-03-2015 In compliance of the orders of this Court dated 11.03.2015 Sub-Divisional Officer, Tekari, Gaya is present and states that he will initiate proceedings against Opposite Party Nos. 10 to 13 and 15 to 19 within one week. He also states that

Patna High Court MJC No.1261 of 2014 dt.18-03-2015 2/2 if Opposite Party Nos. 8, 9 and 14 are violating the terms of the bond, petitioner should file such petition and appropriate order shall be passed against Opposite Party Nos. 8, 9 and 14 within a reasonable time not exceeding one month from the date of receipt of the petition from the petitioner.

In view of the aforesaid statement made by Sub-Divisional Officer, Tekari, Gaya, the contempt petition is disposed of.

(V.N. Sinha, J) P.K.P.