Chandan Kewat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17972 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -170 Year- 2016 Thana -GOPALPUR District- PATNA ====================================================== Chandan Kewat, Son of Sri Sothi Kewat, Resident of village- Sampatchak, Police Station- Gopalpur, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhileshwar Pd. Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Amrit Anunay, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-05-2017 This is an application for grant of bail for offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)a/26 of the Arms Act. Allegation against the petitioner is that there is recovery of loaded pistol from the possession of the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case. He has got no criminal antecedent and he is in custody for more than four months. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that he has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody for more four months, let above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17972 of 2017 (3) dt.01-05-2017 2/2 learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case no. 170 of 2016 giving rise to G.R. No. 7720 of 2016 with the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. (ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T