Kaju Yadav @ Kaju Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11826 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-619 Year-2024 Thana- RAJAON District- Banka ====================================================== Kaju Yadav @ Kaju Kumar Yadav S/o- Arvind Yadav @ Arbind Yadav Resident of Chhoti Ghutiya Shyampur P.S- Rajoun, Dist- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Rajoun P.S. Case No. 619 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 308(2), 352, 351(2), 3/5 of the B.N.S., 2023.
3.The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner, along with others, arrived near the house of the informant and started abusing him. When the informant peeped through the window, he found that all the persons were standing and were threatening to kill him. It is further alleged that they all have made firing. On alarms being raised, villagers arrived there. The accused persons have demanded one lakh rupees as rangdari, failing which they have threatened the informant of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11826 of 2026(3) dt.10-04-2026 2/3 dire consequences.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that from perusal of the FIR, it is clear that only allegation against the petitioner is that he has made firing. Nobody has received any kind of injury. The nature of allegation is general and omnibus. He further submits that the learned trial court has rejected the bail of this petitioner only on the basis of his antecedents. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 29.10.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner has criminal antecedent of twenty six cases.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall remain physically present on each and every date fixed by the learned trial court, one of the bailor should be his near relative and shall also mark his weekly attendance at Sabour P.S. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11826 of 2026(3) dt.10-04-2026 3/3 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Banka in connection with Rajoun P.S. Case No. 619 of 2024. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T