Kundan Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No 11826 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -440 Year- 2016 Thana -CHAPRA TOWN District- SARAN ====================================================== Kundan Kumar Singh, Son of Manoj Kumar Singh, resident of VillageBara Telpa, Nai Basti, P.S.- Chapra Town, District- Saran, at Chapra. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr Rajeev Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Rita Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is a second attempt made by the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with Chapra Town Police Station Case No 440 of 2016 registered for the offence under Sections 399, 401, 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25, 26, 35 of Arms Act.

It has been submitted by the petitioner that earlier the petitioner moved for bail and this Court, vide order dated 23.12.2016 passed in Cr Misc No 54938 of 2016, has disposed of the application of the petitioner with liberty to petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge in this case. It has also been submitted that now charge has been framed which is apparent from para 5 of the petition.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11826 of 2017 (2) dt.22-03-2017 2/2 Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the submission as above, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge XI, Saran at Chapra in Sessions Trial No 14 of 2017 corresponding Chapra Town Police Station Case No 440 of 2016, subject to the conditions that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the Court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the Court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) M.E.H./- U T