← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13481/2023rejected

Sanjeev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-05-10Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13481 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-319 Year-2022 Thana- KHAGARIA District- Khagaria ====================================================== SANJEEV KUMAR S/o Late Rambilash Sharma R/o Village- Dhushmuri, Bishanpur, P.S.- Muffasil, Distt- Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 10-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 03.06.2022 in connection with Khagaria (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 319 of 2022, F.I.R. dated 14.04.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. According to prosecution case, the minor daughter of the informant was kidnapped by the petitioner and co-accused for the purpose of solemnizing marriage. It is further alleged that some other co-accused persons helped them in this kidnapping. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case and as per allegation in the FIR the informant has alleged that the petitioner has kidnapped his daughter who is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13481 of 2023(2) dt.10-05-2023 2/2 aged about thirteen years with the intention to marry her. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations in the FIR are false and fabricated and petitioner has not committed any offence as mentioend in the FIR and the victim was recovered and in her statement recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C., she has firmly stated that she went from her house out of her own sweet will and nobody has kidnapped her. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the victim was minor at the time of alleged occurrence and it appears that at the influence of petitioner victim has left her house.

Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Khagaria (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 319 of 2022 pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria.

Prayer is refused.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Shahnawaz/- U T