Hareram Acharya v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3279 of 2016 ====================================================== Hareram Acharya son of Late Narayan Acharya, Resident of VillageAkbarpur Benk, P.S.- Biroul, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Secretary, Public Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The District Magistrate, Darbhanga 3.

The Additional Collector, Darbbhanga 4.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Biroul, District- Darbhanga 5.

The Circle Officer-cum-Anchaladhikari, Biroul, District- Darbhanga 6.

Sri Nand Kishore Purvey 7.

Mohan Purvey Both sons of Late Ramrup Purvey, resident of village- Benk, P.S.- Biroul, District- Darbhanga 8.

Md. Javed @ Bablu son of Sarfuddin, At and P.O.- Balia, P.S.- Biroul, District- Darbhanga 9.

Abdul Gafoor Son of Late Kari 10.

Khalil son of Late Kari Both residents of Afjal Bus Stand, P.S.- Biroul, District- Darbhanga 11.

Ramauta Pandit @ Baso Pandti, son of Late Bhikha Pandit, Resident of village- Afzal Bus Stand, P.S.- Biroul, District- Darbhanga 12.

Tuntun Mandal son of Late Juge Mandal, Resident of Afzal Bus Stand, P.S.- Biroul, District- Darbhanga ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinod Gautam, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Dhurjati Kr. Prasad, GP-14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 28-03-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this is an application for issuance of a direction to the Respondents to remove the illegal encroachment from the P.W.D. Road, passing from Afzal Bus Stand Supaul Bazar to

Patna High Court CWJC No.3279 of 2016(2) dt.28-03-2023 2/2 telephone exchange office and take suitable legal action through a legal proceeding as contemplated under Public Land Encroachment Act."

At the outset, the learned counsel for the RespondentState has referred to the counter affidavit, filed in the present case and has submitted that the encroachment in question has already stood removed, hence, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous.

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U