Rajendra Prasad And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6688 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -548 Year- 2014 Thana -BETTIAH TOWN DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Rajendra Prasad, son of late Sharmanand Sah

2. Rajiv Prasad @ Rajiv, son of Balishter Prasad

3. Prabhu Prasad @ Prabhuji, son of Dinanath Prasad .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. P.N.Pandit (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-02-2016 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in the petition.

Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147/148/149/323/324/379/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently during investigation section 384 IPC was also added.

Prosecution case is that the informant while sleeping in the house, the accused persons broke open the door when coaccused Vijay Prasad Gupta and the petitioners entered into the informant's room and started breaking the articles. On protest

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6688 of 2016 (2) dt.15-02-2016 2/2 being made accused persons tried to stab the informant and made assault. It is further alleged that petitioner no.2 took away Samsung mobile of the informant when petitioner no.2 snatched Rs.14,000/- from the pocket of the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that accusation has been levelled in the background of land dispute. There is counter version of the occurrence also and the informant has rceived superficial simple injuries. A statement has been made in paragraph 3 of the petition that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of `10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with Bettiah Town P.S. Case No.548/2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Ashwini/- U T