Resma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11271 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-259 Year-2025 Thana- JOKIHAT District- Araria ====================================================== 1.

Resma Wife of Fida Hussain Resident of Village- Bhagwanpur, Ward no. 4, PS- Jokiat District -Araria 2.

Asmira Wife of Nabi Hussain @ Nabi Hasan Resident of VillageBhagwanpur, Ward no. 4, PS- Jokiat District -Araria 3.

Fida Hussain son of Nabi Hussain @ Nabi Hasan Resident of VillageBhagwanpur, Ward no. 4, PS- Jokiat District -Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-04-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 132, 262, 303(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners had earlier moved this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3442 of 2026 and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners after arguing vehemently sought permission to withdraw the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11271 of 2026(2) dt.15-04-2026 2/2 anticipatory bail application and permission was accorded.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners next submits that on account of pressure of the petitioners, the second anticipatory bail application has been filed, on which the learned APP submits that it absolutely does not stand to reason that whether the same is a ground for preferring second anticipatory bail when earlier anticipatory bail application was sought to be withdrawn. The learned APP also submits that it sets a wrong trend that lawyers under pressure of the client, without appreciating the law, file applications.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned APP for the State, the Court is not inclined to entertain the second anticipatory bail application.

6. Accordingly, the instant second anticipatory bail application stands rejected.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T