← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6595/2021withdrawn

Nilam Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2022-01-28Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad,Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 6595 of 2021 ====================================================== Nilam Devi W/o Ram Sevak Yadav R/o village-Shivaisinghpur, PS-Lakhnaur, District-Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food Supply and Consumer Protection Department Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Commissioner Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga 3.

The District Magistrate Madhubani 4.

The District Supply Officer Madhubani 5.

The Sub-Divisional Officer Jhannjharpur, Madhubani 6.

The Block Supply Officer Lakhnaur, Madhubani 7.

Smt Kiran Kumar w/o Mahesh Kumar R/o village-.........................PS-...........................,District-.................. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Lalit Kishore ( Ag ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH and HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH) 28-01-2022 This case has been taken up for online hearing through video-conference because of COVID 19 pandemic restrictions.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, after some argument, seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission is accorded.

This application is dismissed as withdrawn.

It goes without saying that the petitioner shall be at

Patna High Court CWJC No.6595 of 2021(2) dt.28-01-2022 2/2 liberty to question the correctness of the selection list, if the same is prepared for grant of licence under Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (for brevity, BTPDS) (Control) Order, 2016, before the competent authority in accordance with the provisions under the BTPDS (Control) Order, 2016. Petitioner shall also be at liberty to seek condonation of delay, if any question of limitation arises before the competent authority.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) (Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- U