Prabhat Kumar Rahi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3649 of 2015 =========================================================== Prabhat Kumar Rahi (Hindi Teacher), Rameshwar High School, Hansepur-Rampur, Nalanda, son of Sri Hazari Rahi, permanent resident of Village-Chakki Pakri, P.O.- D.K. Sikarpur, P.S. Shikarpur, District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Law Secretary, Bihar, Patna.

2. Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

3. Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna.

4. District Magistrate, Biharsharif, Nalanda.

5. District Education Officer, Biharsharif, Nalanda.

6. District Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Zila Parishad, Biharsharif, Nalanda.

7. The Chairman, Zila Parishad, Biharsharif, Nalanda.

8. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

9. Superintendent of Police, Biharsharif, Nalanda.

10. Sri Amresh Kumar Singh, S.H.O. O.P. Peerbighaha, P.O.-Rasisa, DistrictNalanda.

11. Ashutosh Prasad, S.H.O. Aungari, District-Nalanda.

12. Sri Mithilanand Thaur, Sub-Inspector of Police, Angari, District-Nalanda. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Rahi, ( in person) For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar, AC to GA-12 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 15-02-2017 Interlocutory Application No. 18 of 2017 The petitioner has sought permission of this Court so as to authorise Sri Raju Kumar, son of Indradeo Prasad, as his representative to appear on his behalf in the present public interest litigation. We do not find that the petitioner can be permitted to authorise any other person to represent him in the facts and

Patna High Court CWJC No.3649 of 2015 dt.15-02-2017 2/2 circumstances of the case.

The Interlocutory Application stands dismissed. Re.: CWJC No.3649 of 2015 The writ applicant is an accused in Anugari P.S. Case No.56 of 2014 registered under Sections 341, 323, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code in which charge-sheet has been submitted to the Court and the writ applicant is arrayed as an accused. Therefore, the present is a case where the writ application is nothing but to take a plea in defence in criminal trial initiated against him. Consequently, the present writ application is disposed of with liberty to the writ applicant to take such pleas as are available to him during the course of trial before learned trial Court. (Hemant Gupta, ACJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) Sunil/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N. A.

Uploading Date 17.02.2017 Transmission Date