← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3119/2016disposed

Vijay Kumar Pandey v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-11-29Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3119 of 2016 ====================================================== Vijay Kumar Pandey S/o Late Kishori Prasad @ Suresh Pandey resident of Mohalla - Basawan Dalmia Nagar, P.O. Dehri - On - Sone, District - Rohtas at Sasaram.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Principal Secretary, Co - Operative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Registrar, Co - Operative Societies, Bihar, Patna.

4. District Co - Operative Officer, Aurangabad.

5. Treasury Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram.

6. Accountant General of Bihar, Birchand Patel Path, Bihar, Patna.

7. District Provident Fund Officer, Aurangabad. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shanti Pratap and Mr. Arvind Kumar Varma, Advocates For the State :

Mr. K. K. Jha, A.A.G. 8 For the Accountant General :

Mr. Binod Kumar Labh, S.C.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 29-11-2017 Heard Mr. Shanti Prartap, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. Kaushal Kumar Jha, learned AAG-8 for the State and Mr. Binod Kumar Labh, learned counsel for the Accountant General.

2. In view of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no. 2 today, the Court is satisfied that the grievance of the petitioner which mainly relates to G.P.F. has been redressed. Further, the prayer for other post retiral dues, there is no dispute that any post retiral dues remain unpaid. This is the admitted

Patna High Court CWJC No.3119 of 2016 (7) dt.29-11-2017 2/2 position at the Bar.

3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there may be other benefits of which the petitioner was not earlier aware for which liberty be given to him to raise it before the appropriate forum, in accordance with law.

4. In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed off with liberty aforesaid.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U