Sanjula Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16795 of 2013 ====================================================== Sanjula Kumari Wife Of Sri Arun Prasad Resident Of Village - Ranabigha, P.S. Deepnagar, District - Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Secretary, Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Integrated Child Development Scheme Bihar, Indira Bhhawan, Patna 3.

The Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna 4.

The District Magistrate, Nalanda 5.

The Deputy Development Commissioner, District - Nalanda 6.

The District Welfare Officer, District - Nalanda 7.

The Sub - Divisional Magistrate, Nalanda Sub Division, Nalanda 8.

The Child Development Project Officer, Bihar Sharif, District - Nalanda 9.

Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Ranabigha, P.S. Deepnagar, District - Nalanda 10.

Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Ranabigha, P.S. Deepnagar, District - Nalanda 11.

Sanju Devi Wife Of Sri Binod Kumar Resident Of Village - Ranabigha, Gram Panchayat Ranabigha, P.S. Deepnagar, District - Nalanda ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rabi Bhushan Prasad No. 1, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Raju Giri, GP-30 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 17-01-2023

1. Heard the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has filed an appeal against the appointment of the respondent no.11 on the post of Anganwari worker to the Collector/District Magistrate, which has remained undecided, and therefore, he has filed this writ petition.

Patna High Court CWJC No.16795 of 2013(2) dt.17-01-2023 2/2

3. A writ petition relating to Anganwari worker, which is a contractual appointment under a particular scheme would not lie as per guidelines. The appeal thus lie to the District Magistrate with further revision to the Commissioner.

4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to pursue the appeal, this writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable with liberty to file appeal. The same shall be decided by the concerned District Magistrate expeditiously preferably within a period of three months.

(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) amit/- Item no.24 U