Vikram Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2320 of 2015 ===========================================================
1. Vikram Kumar son of Late Narendra Kumar (Ex. Jr. Engineer, PHED) at Ward No. 14, Shivpuri near Satsang Bhawan, Saharsa, Post AND District - Saharsa - 852201.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. The Principal Secretary, Public Health AND Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Chief Engineer (Mechanical), Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Circle, Saharsa, At AND PO Saharsa, District - Saharsa.
5. The District Magistrate-cum-Chairman, District Compassionate Committee, Saharsa.
6. The Executive Engineer, Public Health Division, Saharsa, At AND PO - Saharsa, District - Saharsa.
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. SC8- KUMAR ALOK =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 06-02-2015 *************** 06.02.2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The District Magistrate-cum-Chairman, District Compassionate Appointment Committee, Saharsa, vide Annexure-4, had made recommendations in favour of the candidates, who have qualified the eligibility under the compassionate head. Name of the petitioner is contained at Srl. No. 12. Petitioner is to be appointed under compassionate category under the Superintending Engineer, PHED Circle, Saharsa. More than a year has gone past, but the appointment letter is still proving to be
Patna High Court CWJC No.2320 of 2015 dt.06-02-2015 2/2 illusive to the petitioner. Obviously, the reason for such delay creates unnecessary litigations and compels citizens to approach the High Court.
The writ application is allowed with a direction upon the Superintending Engineer, PHED Circle, Saharsa that the appointment of the petitioner must go through, if there is no legal impediment created after the recommendation, contained in Annexure-4 within a period of eight weeks from the date of production / communication of a copy of this Order.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) SKM/- U