Niranjan Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19689 of 2018 ====================================================== Niranjan Kumar Sinha S/o Satyanarayan Prasad R/o Mauza-Chikni, P.O.- Jokiyari, P.S.-Raxaul, District-East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Director, Land Acquisition, Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Joint Secretary, Department of Home, Bihar, Patna. 6.

The Collector, Motihari.

7.

The Land Acquisition Officer, Motihari.

8.

The Union of India, through the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, through its Secretar 9.

The Secretary, Border Management Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, North Block, New Delhi ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms.Mallika Mazumdar, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Dhurjati Kumar Prasad, G.P.-14 For the respondent :

Mr. Anshay Bahadur Mathur, C.G.C.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 18-11-2025 Heard Miss Mallika Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:

(i) for a direction for payment of of the money to the farmers whose land have been acquired in 2011 by S.S.B. (Seema Surkhsa Bal) for Construction of its Head Quarters

Patna High Court CWJC No.19689 of 2018(5) dt.18-11-2025 2/2 in Mauza Chikni, District E. Champaran.

And the entire compensation money has not been paid to farmers. The rest money should be paid with interest amount. That the remaining amount should be paid as per new Act.

3. A counter affidavit has come duly served upon the petitioner recording that the rest of the 20% has been paid to the petitioner after production of the relevant papers.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner candidly accepts that now nothing remains as the 20% has been paid.

5. In that background, taking note of the averment made in the counter affidavit duly signed by the respondent nos. 6 and 7, the writ petition is disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U