Sikandar Ram @ Sikendar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10811 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2021 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad ====================================================== SIKANDAR RAM @ SIKENDAR KUMAR Son of Late Lakhan Ram R/O Village - Deudhi, P.S.- Barun, District - Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sunaina Devi Wife of Sikandar Ram @ Sikendar Kumar D/O Bigan Ram, R/O Village - Deudhi, P.S.- Barun, District - Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 04-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 498(A), 354, 323, 341, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3, 4 of the D.P. Act.

The prosecution case, in brief, is that earlier the marriage of the informant was solemnized with the petitioner and the petitioner along with co-accused used to torture the informant mentally and physically due to non-fulfillment of dowry demand and also assaulted her.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10811 of 2023(2) dt.04-05-2023 2/2 petitioner is husband of the informant due to which he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He has never demanded dowry from the informant and still ready to keep his wife/informant with full dignity and honour. A statement has been made in para-3 of the petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 30.11.2022. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 32 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Aurangabad (Bihar) learned trial court is directed to make efforts for settling the dispute which has been arouse between the parties. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Amandeep/- U T