← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17985/2017bail granted

Ramanandan Paswan @ Nata v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-03Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17985 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -203 Year- 2016 Thana -RAHUI District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Ramanandan Paswan @ Nata son of Deoki Paswan @ Sadhu Jee, resident of village -Bokna, PS-Rahui (Bhaganbigha), District-Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : . Sri Ajay Kumar-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Rahui (Bhaganbigha) P.S. Case No. 203 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under sections 25(1-b) (a)/26 of the Arms Act.

The petitioner had earlier moved before this Court for bail in Cr. Misc. No. 45822 of 2016 and this Court, vide order dated 24.10.2016 rejected the same with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completion of eight months in jail-custody. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 26.07.2016.

Having considered the period of custody, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17985 of 2017 (2) dt.03-05-2017 2/2 bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Rahui (Bhaganbigha) P.S. Case No. 203 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be father/mother/wife/son of the petitioner.

(ii) If the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail, (iii) The petitioner would cooperate in the proceeding of the court below. In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T