Satrudhan Sharma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20210 of 2018 ====================================================== Satrudhan Sharma, Son of Padumdev Sharma, Resident of VillageAngrahi,P.S.-Angrahi,P.S. Daudnagar,Distt.-Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The District Magistrate, Aurangabad 3.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, S.D.O. Daudnagar, P.O.+P.S.-Daudnagar,Distt.- Aurangabad.

4.

Anchal Adhikhari,Daudnagar,P.O.P.S. Daudnagar,Distt.-Aurangabad (Bihar) 5.

Nanheshwar Singh Son of Late Ram Pratap Singh 6.

Brij Kishore Sharma Son of Late Janeshwar Singh 7.

Rameshwar Sharma Son of Late Jagnarayan Singh 8.

Bindeshwar Singh Son of Late Ram Baran Sharma 9.

Baikunth Sharma Son of Late Bharosa Sharma 10.

Mahendra Sharma Son of Late Bharosa Sharma 11.

Dinesh Singh Son of Late Shiv Sagar Sharma All Resident of Village-Angrahi,P.S. Daudnagar,Distt.-Aurangaba (Bihar) ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajiv Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ajay- GA5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 06-01-2020 The petition filed on 08.10.2018 is listed for hearing for the first time today before the Court.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief: "(i) For a direction to the respondents to remove the

Patna High Court CWJC No.20210 of 2018(2) dt.06-01-2020 2/3 encroachment made on the public road (Aam Rasta) mentioned in Paragraph 4 of this writ petition by the respondent nos. 5 to 11.

(ii) For a direction to the respondent nos. 3 to 4 to clear the Public Road (Aam Rasta) of Village Angrahi P.S. Daudnagar, District Aurangabad for free movement of the public and vehicles. (iii) Any other order or orders."

After the matter was heard for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner shall be content if a direction is issued to the concerned respondents to consider and decide the representation, which the petitioner shall be making afresh within a period of four weeks from today. Learned counsel for the State states that upon receipt of such request, if any, the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law, expeditiously and positively within a period of three months from the date of receipt thereof. Equally, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such alternative remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law.

We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes recourse to such remedies, as are otherwise available in law, before the appropriate forum, the same shall be dealt with, in accordance with law and with reasonable dispatch.

Patna High Court CWJC No.20210 of 2018(2) dt.06-01-2020 3/3 The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Sunil/- U