Vinay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15611 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Vinay Kumar Son of Surendra Kumar Resident of Village- Lodipur Neuri, P.S.- Belaganj, District- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER 12-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 20.01.2017 in connection with Belaganj P.S.Case No. 70 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420, 468, 469, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. As per complaint petition, which was registered as Complaint Case No. 1574 of 2012, the petitioner being member of various cooperative societies had taken loan and did not return the said loan. The complainant was the Chairman of the said Cooperative society.

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the said case by the Complainant and false allegation of demanding rangdari, has also been alleged against the petitioner, hence, this

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15611 of 2017 (2) dt.12-04-2017 2/2 false case has been lodged. It has further been submitted that a large number of cooperative societies have been formed and several cases have been lodged against the petitioner of taking loan and not returning the money back but there is not a chit of paper to show that the petitioner had in fact taken any loan rather contribution money of the petitioner is lying with the society and the informant is trying to misappropriate the entire amount, which appears from orders of this Court vide Annexure- 3 series in which for other cases instituted by the Complainant, the petitioner has been granted bail.

However, learned A.P.P. for the opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials available on record, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Belaganj P.S.Case No. 70 of 2016. (Nilu Agrawal, J) Sudha/- U T