Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14168/2017bail granted

Akhilesh Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-11Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14168 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -7 Year- 2016 Thana -CHAPRA RPF/POST District- SARAN ====================================================== Akhilesh Ram, Son of Khublal Ram, resident of Mohalla- Rajendra Stedium Kushtha Kalony, P.S. Town, District- Saran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER ----------- 11-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chapra/R.P.F. P.S. Case No.07 of 2016 registered under Section 3 R.P.U.P. Act. The accusation is that this petitioner and one Md. Talvir were apprehended by the railway police with nine batteries removed from the coach of the train standing on the yard of the Chapra Railway Station.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner had no criminal antecedent but after being apprehended by the police in the present case on suspicion, the petitioner has been remanded in another case bearing

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14168 of 2017 (4) dt.11-05-2017 2/2 Chapra/R.P.F. Case No.08 of 2016 in which the petitioner has already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.03.2017 passed in Criminal Misc. No.12041 of 2017. In the present case, the petitioner is in custody since 26.10.2016. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Railway Judicial Magistrate, Sonepur, Saran, in connection with Chapra/R.P.F. Rail P.S. Case No.07 of 2016. Out of the two sureties, one must be close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he/she is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T