Sanjay Kumar Suman v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6141 of 2026 ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar Suman Son of Late Bigu Das, Resident of Mahadalit village Bishambharpur Ward No. 07, P.O Aura, P.S. Tariyani, District- Sheohar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The District Magistrate, Sheohar.

6.

The Sub-Divisional Magistrate (S.D.M.), Sheohar. 7.

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Sheohar. 8.

The Block Development Officer (B.D.O.), Tariyani, District- Sheohar. 9.

The Circle Officer (C.O.), Tariyani, District- Sheohar. 10.

The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Sheohar. 11.

Tha Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Bishambharpur, Block - Tariyani, DistrictSheohar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Government Pleader (5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 27-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The present writ application in the form of a Public Interest Litigation has been preferred by the petitioner for the following reliefs:- "1. That the present writ application is being filed in the nature of Public Interest Litigation

Patna High Court CWJC No.6141 of 2026(2) dt.27-07-2026 2/2 for direction to the Respondents to make a Road over Plot No. 1 Khata No. 393 Khesra No. 1120 in the village-Bishambharpur in the District-Sheohar after completing all the formalities."

3. Upon perusal of record, it appears that the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 29.12.2023 (Annexure-P/2 to the present writ application) before Respondent No. 5, which is still pending consideration.

4. Considering the same, Respondent No. 5 is directed to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation by passing a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to all the stakeholders, preferably within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present writ application stands disposed of.

6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sudhir Singh, ACJ) (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Sachin/- U