Golu Kumar @ Baap Jee v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11247 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2019 Thana- BIKRAM District- Patna ====================================================== Golu Kumar @ Baap Jee Son of Sujeet singh Resident of Village - Khoraitha, P.S.- Bikram, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rama Kant Sharma, Sr. Advocate : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s:

Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-08-2022 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Let the defects, as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 385, 387, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

According to prosecution case, there is allegation that petitioner has demanded ransom from the informant on Mobile No. 7814683982.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case only on the basis of suspicion. He further submits

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11247 of 2022(3) dt.16-08-2022S 2/3 that investigating agency has not collected the call details and no offence is made out against the petitioner under Sections 385, 387 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and it is admitted fact that no extortion money was given and taken by anyone. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 18.11.2019.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the ground that petitioner carries seven criminal antecedents other than the present one.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Bikram P.S. Case No. 210 of 2019, subject to the following conditions:-

1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11247 of 2022(3) dt.16-08-2022S 3/3 bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

2. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

3. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) sanjeev/- U T