Dilip Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15007 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2021 Thana- SINGHWARA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Dilip Yadav Son of Late Bhuwan Yadav R/o Village- Sotia Brahmapur, P.S.- Kamtaul, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Avinash Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Syed Ehteshamuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Singhwara P.S. Case No. 130 of 2021, dated 05.07.2021 for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 41(i), 41(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018.
3. As per the prosecution case, total 720.120 litres of foreign liquor was recovered from a truck.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition in which he is on bail. The name of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15007 of 2024(2) dt.11-03-2024 2/3 the petitioner has transpired on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Mohan Rai. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner, hence no case is made out against the petitioner. Learned counsel has relied on the judgment of Full Bench of Hon'ble Patna High Court in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. State of Bihar reported in 2019 (2) PLJR 1089. The Full Bench in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav (supra) has held that an application for anticipatory bail in a case arising out of Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act can be maintained, despite the bar under Section 76(2) of the Act, if on the basis of allegation made in the FIR, no offence under the said provision is made out.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act applies in this case.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15007 of 2024(2) dt.11-03-2024 3/3 like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Darbhanga in connection with Singhwara P.S. Case No. 130 of 2021, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Ranjeet/- U T