Shashank Kumar @ Sudhanshu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12833 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-275 Year-2021 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai ====================================================== SHASHANK KUMAR @ SUDHANSHU KUMAR son of Rambali Singh Resident of Village - Gaura - , Police Station - Teghra, District - Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bipin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Naresh Ray, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks.

Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Same be kept on the record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in paragraph 3 of the bail application, in the light of the statement made in the supplementary affidavit, in course of the day.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 376(D), 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of POCSO Act and Sections 3⁄4 of Immoral

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12833 of 2022(2) dt.17-05-2022 2/3 Traffic Act.

Prosecution case, in short, is that the police got information that flesh trade is going on in the house of the petitioner. The police raided and found a couple in compromising position and flesh trade was going on. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has been made accused due to mistake of fact. The premises in question was given on rent to the co-accused persons. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the activities being carried out by the accused persons in the said premises. The statement of the victim has been recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. The victim has not named the petitioner.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case/F.I.R. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12833 of 2022(2) dt.17-05-2022 3/3 District Judge VI-cum-Special Judge, POCSO Act, Begusarai in connection with Teghra P.S. case No.275 of 2021 (POCSO case No.57 of 2021), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T