Guddu @ Tanjil Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11355 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2025 Thana- ANGARH District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

Guddu @ Tanjil Alam S/O Majebul R/O Vill.- Abhaypur, P.S.- Rauta, Dist.- Purnea.

2.

Tariq Anwar @ Md. Tariq Anwar S/O Tauhid Alam @ Md. Tauhid Alam @ Md. Tohid R/O Vill.- Abhaypur, P.S.- Rauta, Dist.- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyameshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Angarh P.S. Case No. 90/2025 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 164.805 litres of liquor was recovered from two motorcycles.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioners have got no knowledge and concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioners are in no manner connected with the vehicles in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11355 of 2026(2) dt.13-02-2026 2/2 question or with the alleged recovery of liquor. The other coaccused person has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Bench vide order dated 05.02.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 8616 of 2026. Learned counsel, therefore, submitted that prima facie, no case is made out against the petitioners. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Angarh P.S. Case No. 90/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) manish/- U T