Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14917/2013disposed

Jagdish Prasad Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2015-07-16Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 14917 of 2013 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -132 Year- 2011 Thana -BABUBARHI District- MADHUBANI ======================================================

1. Jagdish Prasad Singh Son of Late Hirai Singh Resident of VillageAurahi, P.S.- Babubarhi, District- Madhubani.

2. Indra Kumar Singh Son of Sri Jagdish Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Aurahi, P.S.- Babubarhi, District- Madhubani.

3. Dinesh Kumar Singh Son of Sri Jagdish Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Aurahi, P.S.- Babubarhi, District- Madhubani.

4. Deo Narain Singh Son of Late Srilal Singh Resident of Village- Aurahi, P.S.- Babubarhi, District- Madhubani.

5. Adhikari Singh Son of Late Puran Singh Resident of Village- Aurahi, P.S.- Babubarhi, District- Madhubani.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Sobhit Saday Son of Late Jagan Saday, Village- Bhatchoura Aurahi, P.S. Babubarhi, District- Madhubani.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 16-07-2015 Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2. The present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeks quashing of the order dated 11.12.2012 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in T.R. No. 3076 of 2013 arising out of Babubarhi P.S. Case No. 132 of 2011, by which cognizance has been taken under Sections 341/323/504/506/436 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section 3(1)(v)(x)(xv) and 3(2)(iii)(iv)(v) of The Scheduled Castes and Schedules Tribes

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14917 of 2013 (4) dt.16-07-2015 2/2 (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and the petitioners have been summoned.

After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the application with a liberty that the points available to him in support of his defence shall be placed before the Court at the time of framing of the charge.

In view of the aforesaid, the application stands disposed off as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U