Uma Shankar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3887 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15444 of 2010 ====================================================== Uma Shankar Singh S/o Late Ram Bihari Singh R/o Shantinagar, P.O. Bikramganj, P.S.- Bikramganj, Distt.- Rohtas at presently R/o Kharnha, P.S.- Surajpura, Dist. Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Mr. Ramashankar Prasad, Daftuar the Director, Integrated Child Development Scheme, Bihar, Patna 3.

Mis. Ranjita, The District Magistrate, Siwan, Dist. Siwan null null 4.

Smt. Sarli, the District Programme Officer, Siwan, Dist.- Siwan 5.

Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh the Child Development Project Officer, Hussainganj, Dist.- Siwan 6.

Mr. Pankaj Dixit, The District Magistrate, Rohtas 7.

Mr. Sunita Kumari The District Programme officer, Rohtas at Sasaram 8.

Mr. Asha Kumari The Child development Priject officer, Chenari, Dist. Rohtas.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sri Krishna Ranjan, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, GA-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 25-06-2026 Heard Mr. Sri Krishna Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

2. The present petition has been preferred:

"for initiation of contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for deliberately and willfully violated the order dated 16.01.2018 passed by the Hon'ble Court in CWJC No. 15444 of 2010."

Patna High Court MJC No.3887 of 2018(4) dt.25-06-2026 2/2

3. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite party no.2 with a calculation chart to show that the order stands complied.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he still has come grievance and thus may be permitted to approach the Director, ICDS, Bihar, Patna (opposite party no.2) for the redressal of the grievance.

5. This Court is satisfied that the order stands complied, after granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter if still he has come grievance before appropriate forum.

6. With the aforesaid observation MJC No. 3887 of 2018 is disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U