Patna High CourtCWJC/3903/2016disposed

Jahid Ansari @ Jahid Hussain And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-02-25Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran1 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.3903 of 2016 (2) dt.25-02-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3903 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Jahid Ansari @ Jahid Hussain, on of late Badrul Hasan, resident of Village-Jaimal Dumari, P.S. Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur.

2. Ranbir Singh @ Ranbir Prasad Singh, son of Ram Shrestha Singh, resident of Village- Shah Mohammad Dumari, P.S. Paroo, DistrictMuzaffarpur.

3. Lalan Chaubey, son of late Feku Chaubey, resident of Village- Jaimal Dumari, P.S.- Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur.

4. Bhola Rajak, son of late Yugul Rajak, resident of Village- Jainul Dumari, P.S.- Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate -cum- District Election Officer (Panchayat), Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur.

3. The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur.

4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, West Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur.

5. The Block Development Officer, Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur.

6. The State Election Commission (Panchayat), Sone Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patna through the State Election Commissioner.

7. The State Election Commissioner, the State Election Commission (Panchayat), Sone Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

8. The Secretary, the State Election Commission (Panchayat), Sone Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh For the Respondent-State : Mr. G.P. Ojha, GP-22 For the Respondent-SEC : Mr. Amit Shrivastava Mr. Girish Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 25-02-2016 The defect is ignored.

However, in the nature of relief prayed in the writ petition no indulgence can be granted.

The writ petition is disposed of.

(Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/- U