Sujit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14084 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-984 Year-2023 Thana- ARA NAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.

Sujit Kumar Son of Shravan Kumar Gupta Resident of Village/ MohallaDharhara Hanuman Tola, P.S.- Ara Nagar, District- Bhojpur 2.

Rahul Kumar Son of Shravan Kumar Gupta Resident of Village/ MohallaDharhara Hanuman Tola, P.S.- Ara Nagar, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Diwakar .

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-07-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 353 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners at the outset submits that petitioners will not abscond rather will co-operate in the investigation.

4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14084 of 2024(4) dt.01-07-2024 2/2 within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Ara Nagar P.S. Case No.984/2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

6. However, it is made clear that in the event if the Investigating Officer of the case files an application before the learned trial court bringing to his notice that the petitioners despite giving assurance to this court are not co-operating in the investigation in that event the learned trial court shall be at liberty to forthwith cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners and to take all coercive steps to ensure that petitioners are behind bars.

7. It is further made clear that in the event if the charge sheet is submitted connecting the petitioners with the offence, in that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall loose its effect.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T