Upendra Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11670 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2020 Thana- MAHILA P.S District- Supaul ====================================================== Upendra Mandal Son of Chhutahru Mandal R/o Village- Barhara, P.S.- Marounda, District- Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

Yashoda Devi Wife of Upendra Mandal, D/o Rambhola Mandal R/o VillageAsanpur Kupha, P.S.- Kishanpur, District- Supaul. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Arun Kumar Jha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP For O.P. No.2 :

Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 04-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of O.P. No.2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 323, 341, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Petitioner, who is husband of opposite party no.2, is said to have ousted the opposite party no.2 from her matrimonial home in association of his family members over the dowry demand. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and has committed no offence. Petitioner has neither made any dowry demand nor drove her out of her matrimonial home nor tormented her over the demand of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11670 of 2023(3) dt.04-07-2023 2/2 dowry. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006 (3) PLJR 182. In that view of the matter, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Supaul Mahila P.S. Case No.10 of 2020, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the learned court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or for one time settlement.

Accordingly, this application stands disposed of. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) S.KUMAR/- U T