Lalan Goswami v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1204 of 2017 (3) dt.29-06-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.1204 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -168 Year- 2016 Thana -MAUZAHIDPUR District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================
1. Lalan Goswami Son of Late Uchit Goswami, Resident of Mohalla - Aliganj Maheshpur, P.S. Babarganj Mojadihpur, District - Bhagalpur .... .... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Dr. Manoj Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Smt Usha Kumari No-1, SPL, PP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2017 The appellant is in custody since 03.01.2017 in connection with Mojahidpur (Babarganj) P.S. Case No. 168 of 2016 registered for offences punishable under Sections 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(2) (v) SC/ST Act.
It has been submitted on behalf of the appellant that he was arrested in connection with other case and has been remanded in the present case. In this case it has been submitted on behalf of the appellant that in fact he was arrested in other case and has been remanded in this case and save and except there is no allegation against the appellant to connect him with the present case and he is in custody since 03.01.2017 and has no criminal antecedent. Heard learned Special P.P. also.
Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, the period of custody and also that the appellant has no criminal antecedent, let the appellant above named, be released on bail on
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1204 of 2017 (3) dt.29-06-2017 furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District Judge-2nd-cum Special Judge, SC/ST Bhagalpur, in connection with Mojahidpur (Babarganj) P.S. Case No. 168 of 2016, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the appellant shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The appellant will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The appellant shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part two appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) siddharth/- U T