← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12282/2026allowed

Saurav Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-18Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10670 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-646 Year-2025 Thana- KADAMKUAN District- Patna ====================================================== Baiju Kumar Son of Indra Chaudhary Resident of - Jethuli, Kachhi Dargah, P.S.- Nadi, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 11945 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-646 Year-2025 Thana- KADAMKUAN District- Patna ====================================================== Karan Kumar Son of Gopal Ray @ Gopal Prasad R/o Village - Sukulpur, P.S. - Fatuha, Distt. - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 12282 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-646 Year-2025 Thana- KADAMKUAN District- Patna ====================================================== Saurav Kumar Son of Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Kumar Resident of Village- Jethuli, Kachchi Dargah, P.S.- Nadi, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 10670 of 2026) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar Pradhan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 11945 of 2026) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jay Ram Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 12282 of 2026) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Niraj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10670 of 2026(2) dt.18-02-2026 2/3 ORAL ORDER 18-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for bail in connection with Kadamkuan P.S. Case No. 646 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 61(2), 109, 111 and 140 of B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that certain unknown miscreants have caught the informant. They were armed with a weapon. When the informant raised alarm, one of them was apprehended who was identified as Saurav Kumar one of the petitioners. Saurav Kumar has disclosed that co-accused Vikash Kumar who is step-brother, has arranged the contract killer at Rs. 8,00,000/-.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. From perusal of the F.I.R., itself it is clear that only Saurav Kumar one of the petitioners was apprehended and from his possession, only a mobile and bike was recovered whereas it is alleged that the miscreants were armed with weapon. It has further been submitted that the name of other two petitioners, namely, Baiju and Karan Kumar has surfaced in the statement of the petitioner, Saurav Kumar. No

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10670 of 2026(2) dt.18-02-2026 3/3 injury was sustained by the informant. It has also been submitted that this case has been filed after taking advice from advocate to implicate the petitioners. The story of arranging the killers is all concocted. Petitioner Baiju and petitioner Karan are languishing in judicial custody since 27.09.2025 whereas petitioner Saurav is languishing in judicial custody since 17.09.2025. Learned counsel has further submitted that one coaccused has been granted bail by this court vide Cr. Misc. No. 91379 of 2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Concerned Court, Patna in connection with Kadamkuan P.S. Case No.646 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) shubham/- U T