Rajo Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11235 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-202 Year-2018 Thana- GAMAHARIYA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Rajo Devi Aged About 52 Years Gender-Female Wife Of Vairagi Bhagat R/O Village- Gamaharia Bhagwat Chowk, P.S- Gamaharia, District- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Dinesh Prasad Verma For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sangeeta Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
Allegation is of recovery of 25.02 Litre of Nepali Soufi liquor from the possession of petitioner.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case on mere suspicion. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11235 of 2019(2) dt.14-03-2019 2/2 custody since 26.12.2018.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Excise Case No. 1717 of 2018(arising out from Gamaharia P.S. Case No. 202 of 2018), with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U