← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16381/2023bail granted

Harishankar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-06-25Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16381 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1303 Year-2020 Thana- SAMASTIPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Samastipur ====================================================== HARISHANKAR SINGH S/o Rajkishore Singh R/o Mohalla Chuna Bhatti near Durga Mandir Naka no. 8, P.S.- L.N.M.U., Distt- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Saraswati Devi D/o Dilip Das, W/o Harishankar Singh R/o MohallaJitwarpur Nijamat, Ward no. 11, Ataran Chowk, P.S.- Muffasil, DisttSamastipur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ugranath Mallik For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur For the O.P. No. 2 :

Mr. Anant Kumar Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-06-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State along with learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that petitioner, being husband, has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the complainant. It is next submitted that petitioner is always ready and willing to restitute his conjugal rights. It is also submitted that petitioner will go to the parental home of the O.P. No. 2 on 01.07.2024 to fetch her back to her matrimonial home.

3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the O.P. No. 2 submits that even O.P. No. 2 is willing to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16381 of 2023(3) dt.25-06-2024 2/3 restitute her conjugal rights, it is next submitted that if the petitioner comes to fetch the O.P. No. 2 back to her matrimonial home, she will accompany him willingly.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, submits that O.P. No. 2 was married to a different person earlier and after his death, the petitioner, knowing the said fact, married her and even took the responsibility of two children from her first marriage which amply demonstrates that petitioner is more than interested in reviving his conjugal relationship.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsels for the parties, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Complaint Case No. 1303 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

6. However, it is made clear that in the event if the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16381 of 2023(3) dt.25-06-2024 3/3 petitioner breaches the undertaking given to this Court, in that event the O.P. No. 2 shall be at liberty to file an application seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T