Arbind Sada v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.16120 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -265 Year- 2016 Thana -BAKHRI District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Arbind Sada Son of Parbhu Sada Resident of Village - Bangraha, P.S. - Khagaria, District - Khagaria.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-05-2017 This is an application for grant of bail for offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Allegation against the petitioner is recovery of one country made pistol with cartridge.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has got no criminal antecedent. He has falsely been implicated in the present case. He has remained in custody for more than four months.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that he has remained in custody for more than four months, let above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five thousand only) with two sureties of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16120 of 2017 (3) dt.01-05-2017 2/2 like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate,Vth , Begusarai, in connection with Bakhri P.S. Case no. 265 of 2016 with the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. (ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T