Ajay Sah @Ujay Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13923 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -13 Year- 2017 Thana -RIVILGANJ District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Ajay Sah @ Ujay Sah, Son of Vishwanath Sah, resdent of VilllageDiliya Rahimpur, Bintoli, P.S. Rivilganj, District Saaran, Chapra. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jagdhar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Revelganj P.S.Case No.13 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. Allegation as per F.I.R. is that on confidential information, the police raided and recovered 75 ltrs. of country-made liquor but that country-made liquor has been recovered from the possession of other accused persons.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion and he has clean antecedent. He has remained in custody for about three months.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13923 of 2017 (3) dt.25-04-2017 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of clean antecedent of the petitioner and the period of custody for about three months, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M. VIII, Saran, Chapra in connection with Revelganj P.S.Case No.13 of 2017. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U