Chhathu Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.5899 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -42 Year- 2015 Thana -UCHAKAGAON District- GOPALGANJ ====================================================== Chhathu Sah, S/o Achhelal Sah, R/o Village- Lion Bazar, P.S.- Mirganj, District- Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Harendra Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. J.N.Thakur, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Unchakagawn P.S. Case No. 42 of 2015 (G.R. No. 826 of 2015), disclosing offences under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act.
The Circle Officer-cum- Block Supply Officer, Unchakagawn is the informant and according to the case of the prosecution, co-accused Rahul Singh was getting Pick-up Van loaded with paddy for the purpose of selling it in black market. Allegedly, petitioner was the driver of the Pick-up Van and attempted to sell the said paddy in the black market, was being made by all the accused persons including this petitioner. It has
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5899 of 2016 (2) dt.22-02-2016 2/2 been stated in the application that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
Considering the submission as above, this application is allowed.
Let the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Unchakagawn P.S. Case No. 42 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
This is subject to the condition that the petitioner shall present himself before the police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on his part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Vats/- U T