← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4484/2020disposed

Sanjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-26Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4484 of 2020 ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar Son of Lal Babu Ray Resident of Village and P.o. and P.s.- Sahdei Bujurg, District- Vaishali at Hajipur, presently working as Clerk in the Sub Divisional Office, West Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 4.

The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur 5.

The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur 6.

The Deputy Collector (Establishment), Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur 7.

The Sub Divisional Officer, West Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Md. N. H. Khan ( Sc1 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 26-08-2022 Today being Friday, matters are being taken up through virtual mode, as per current procedure for hearing. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his representation (Annexure- P-11) was received in office of the District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur on 04.01.2019, wherein he has made a prayer for grant of promotion to the post of Upper Division Clerk in the pay band-1, grade pay- 2400. The limited prayer is for a direction to the District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur (Respondent No. 5) to consider the petitioner's claim and to dispose it of by reasoned and speaking

Patna High Court CWJC No.4484 of 2020(2) dt.26-08-2022 2/2 order in accordance with law.

Since the issue is yet to be considered by Respondent No. 5, this Court does not consider it appropriate to keep the writ petition pending as no adjudication is called for. Learned State counsel has appeared through virtual mode. He does not object to disposal of the writ petition for consideration by the District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in accordance with law.

In view thereof, writ application is disposed of. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur (Respondent No. 5) would be obliged to dispose of the representation within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) SUMIT/- U