Yogendra Yadav @ Jaychandra Yadav @ Company Mahto @ Jaindra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10884 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2019 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada ====================================================== YOGENDRA YADAV @ JAYCHANDRA YADAV @ COMPANY MAHTO @ JAINDRA YADAV Son of Late Amrit Yadav Resident of Village- Bahuara, P.S.- Sirdala, District- Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajeev Nayan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Mushtaque Alam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Sirdalla P.S. Case No. 04 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is recovery of 5 litres of Mahua wine from the possession of petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 06.01.2019

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10884 of 2019(2) dt.03-04-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J.-II cum Special Judge, Nawada, in connection with Sirdalla P.S. Case No. 04 of 2019 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T