Gurudeo Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12584 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-469 Year-2022 Thana- KHAIRA District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

Gurudeo Thakur, S/o Seetaram Thakur, R/o Village - Deopur, P.S.- Khaira, District- Jamui 2.

Dheeraj Thakur, S/o Seetaram Thakur, R/o Village - Deopur, P.S.- Khaira, District- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoranjan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Syed Mojibur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 02-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitionerd and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 469 of 2022 dated 03.12.2022 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 504, 506, 354(b), 147, 148, 511, 376/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that a partition took place between the husband of the complainant and petitioners 10 years ago, but the petitioners were not obeying the terms and conditions of the partition and also destroyed the boundary wall of the informant. It is alleged that on 04.09.2022 at about 8 pm, the petitioners took away the daughter of the informant inside the room and tried to sexually assault her. It is also alleged that co-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12584 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 2/2 accused assaulted the complainant by kick and fist and they also snatched a gold chain from the complainant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that both the sides are agnates. The complainant in the present case is the aunt of the petitioners and the so-called victim is the cousin sister of the petitioners. There is a land dispute between the parties. Lastly, it has been submitted that petitioners have no criminal antecedents.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest / surrender of the petitioners within a period of six weeks from today, in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 469 of 2022, he will be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Khatim Reza, J) premchand/- U T