Pappu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.13875 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -89 Year- 2016 Thana -LADANIA District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== Pappu Yadav, son of Manju Yadav, resident of Village- Betaunha, Ward No.07, P.S.- Jai Nagar, District- Madhubani.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with Ladaniya P.S.Case No. 89 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and 47 of Bihar Excise Act.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is alleged recovery of 186 litres of Nepali wine from the motorcycle of the petitioner and also one motorcycle and petitioner is in custody for seven months having no criminal antecedent.
Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and considering the submission, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13875 of 2017 (2) dt.23-03-2017 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Shashi Bhushan Kumar, Munsif-II-cumJudicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Madhubani, in connection with Ladaniya P.S.Case No. 89 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U