Sudhir Singh @ Sudhir Kumar Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16120 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-196 Year-2018 Thana- RAJAPAKAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

Sudhir Singh @ Sudhir Kumar Singh, aged about 40 years, Male, Son of Narsingh Singh, Resident of Village - Jafarpatti, P.S.Rajapakar, DistrictVaishali. 2.

Rajdeo Singh, aged about 49 years, Male, Son of Bhimraj Singh, Resident of Village - Jafarpatti, P.S.Rajapakar, District-Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anita Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 28-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP representing the State.

Petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Rajapakar P.S. Case No. 196 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 324, 379, 504, 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as per allegations in the First Information Report, petitioner no.1 had allegedly given a 'Garasa' blow which had caused injury on the finger of the left hand of the informant. It is alleged that petitioner no.2 had caught hold of wife of the informant and had made her nude and took away the Gold earrings and box kept in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16120 of 2019(2) dt.28-03-2019 2/3 the house.

Submission is that the informant and the petitioners are close agnates. They are co-sharers and are fighting over a land in connection with which both the parties seems to have indulged in some fight but the allegation is that these petitioners had indulged in giving 'Garasa' blow overhead and made nude the wife of the informant are not correct, flimsy allegations have been made just to harass these petitioners.

Learned APP for the State is present and has opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, wherein both the parties are said to be the co-sharers and are fighting over a land dispute and no specific injury has been brought to the notice of this Court, considering the nature of the allegations, this Court is willing to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Let in case of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the abovenamed petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.15,000/- (rupees fifteen thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M, Vaishali in connection with Rajapakar P.S. Case No. 196 of 2018, subject to the condition that petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16120 of 2019(2) dt.28-03-2019 3/3 shall join the investigation by reporting to the Investigating Officer within a period of two weeks from today and shall cooperate in course of investigation. This will be in addition to condition prescribed under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) R.R.Ojha/- U T