← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/20453/2018disposed

Rubi Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-05-27Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20453 of 2018 ====================================================== Rubi Kumari W/o Dilip Kumar, D/o Kamala Mistry @ Dilip Kumar Sharma, Residence of Village- Bari Ghoshi, Gram Panchayat- Kawa, Ward No.-3, Post- Daha Bigha, P.S.- Hilsa, District- Nalanda, Pin Code- 801302. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The District Magistrate, Nalanda.

3.

District Programme Officer, Nalanda.

4.

Sub Divisional Officer, Hilsa, Nalanda.

5.

Children Development Programme Officer, Hilsa, Nalanda. 6.

Women Supervisor cum Member Secretary Chayan Samiti, of Sevika Hilsa, Nalanda.

7.

Khushaboo Kumari, W/o Shailesh Chand, R/o Village- Bari Ghoshi PostDaha Bigha, P.S.- Hilsa, District- Nalanda Pin Code- 801302. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Subodh Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Mandal -SC3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 27-05-2019 Matter has been listed today in the summer vacations as learned counsel for the petitioner was desirous for consideration of his case during vacation.

The slip for listing was filed pursuant to notice dated 08th May, 2019, published prior to the vacation. The matter is, accordingly, taken up for consideration as both parties are present and willing to assist the court for disposal of the matter.

Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the

Patna High Court CWJC No.20453 of 2018(2) dt.27-05-2019 2/2 respondents-State.

It is submitted by the petitioner's counsel that against the order dated 23.08.2018 issued by the District Programme Officer, Nalanda in Anganbari Appeal no.01/2018, petitioner would avail remedy of appeal under the guidelines before the competent authority.

In view of such submission writ petition need not be kept pending. Petitioner would be at liberty to approach the appropriate authority. It is only observed that it will be open to the petitioner to raise issue of pendency of instant proceedings in this court to meet the ground of delay before the appellate authority.

Writ petition stands disposed off.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) s.hassan/- U