Jitendra Kumar And ORS v. Sri Rajeev Rishi And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.504 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 19524 of 2014 ======================================================
1. Jitendra Kumar Son of Lakhindra Dubey At + P.O. - Bangra Firoj, P.S. - Baruraj, District - Muzaffarpur.
2. Ashok Kumar Son of Raghubans Singh At + P.O. - Bangra Firoj, P.S. - Baruraj, District - Muzaffarpur.
3. Awadh Kishor Son of Harinandan Upadhayay at Kuahi, P.O. Chaurghatta, P.S. - Baruraj, District - Muzaffarpur.
4. Rishikesh Kumar Son of Rambaran Singh At - New Gopalpur Balua, P.O. + P.S. - Motihari, District - East Champaran.
5. Sanjeev Kumar Son of Naresh Kumar Upadhyay at Sulsabad, P.O. - Mehsi, P.S. - Mehsi, District - East Champaran.
6. Sohan Paswan Son of Ambika Paswan at - Unchidih, P.O. - Ram Karan Pakadi, P.S. - Pipara, District - East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. Sri Rajeev Rishi Son of (Name of the father not known to the petiitoner) The Chairman and M.D., Central Bank of India, Chander Mukhi Nariman Point, Mumbai.
2. Sri Ramesh Kumar Arora Son of (Name of the father not known to the petiitoner) The Zonal Manager Central Bank of India, Maurya Lok Complex, 2nd Floor, 'B' Block near Dakbunglow Road, Patna, Bihar.
3. Sri Harishankar Thakur Son of (Name of the father not known to the petiitoner) The Regional Manager Central Bank of India Balua Tal, N.H.T. Balua, Motihari.
4. Sri Prabhunath Chaudhary Son of (Name of the father not known to the petiitoner) The Senior Manager Central Bank of India Balua Tal N.H.T. Balua, Motihari.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Priyank Samdarshi For the Respondent/s : Mr. Nilanjan Chatterjee Mr Neeraj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 07-08-2017 This contempt application now is dismissed in view of the fact that the order passed by this Court has already been set aside by a Division Bench. Merely because the petitioners would like to
Patna High Court MJC No.504 of 2016 (2) dt.07-08-2017 2/2 prefer an SLP that cannot be a ground for keeping the contempt pending.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk U