← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10252/2025bail granted

Rohit Kumar Gond v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-25Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10252 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-545 Year-2024 Thana- KUCHAIKOTE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

Rohit Kumar Gond Son of Ramlakhan Prasad village- Mangalpur, P.S.- Kasya, District- Kushinagar Up 2.

Shiv Kumar Pandey @Shiv Kumar Pandey Sonu son of Radheshyam Pandey village- Katrari, Ps- Kotwali, Dist- Deoria Up ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Indrajeet Bhushan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bishweshwar Ram, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 25-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Kuchaikote PS Case No. 545 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that total 261.12 litres of foreign liquor was recovered from Car. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is submitted that petitioner no. 2 is the driver and petitioner no. 1

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10252 of 2025(2) dt.25-02-2025 2/2 is sitting as a passenger in the vehicle and they have no knowledge regarding the nature of goods kept in the vehicle. The petitioners are in custody since 28.12.2024 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedent of the petitioners and the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7.

Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Kuchaikote PS Case No. 545 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Ranjan/- U T