Babar Miyan And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25932 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -87 Year- 2016 Thana -CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Babar Miyan Son of Late Asanul Miyan

2. Fahima Khatun Wife of Babar Miyan

3. Saira Khatun wife of late Asanul Miyan All are residents of villageBishunpura, Police Station- Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran (Chapra). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 24-08-2016 Heard both sides.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 87/2016, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. The Chowkidar suspected Babar Miyan and his family members killed his daughter Rani Khatun and concealed her dead body, as she had love affair with a boy.

It appears from the case diary that during the course of investigation witnesses have supported the facts. In para 14 of the case diary Noor Jahan disclosed that Babar Miyan, his wife and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25932 of 2016 (3) dt.24-08-2016 2/2 others killed the deceased Rani Khatun.

Considering the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners above-named on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.) Vinita/- U T